CPE Mock Exam 2

Mock Exam 2 — Reading & Use of English

Duration: 90 minutes

Total questions: 53 across 7 parts

Once you click Start, the timer begins. The exam auto-submits when time runs out.

Tip: aim to spend roughly 12 minutes per part. Do not dwell on any single question.

90:00
Time remaining
Part 1 — Multiple-choice Cloze

Questions 1–8

For questions 1–8, read the text below and decide which answer (A, B, C or D) best fits each gap.

The craft of biography

The biographer's task is to (1) _____ the essence of a life in words — a feat that requires both scholarly rigour and imaginative sympathy. Any responsible biographer must (2) _____ every claim against available evidence, yet the sources are rarely complete. Where evidence is ambiguous, the biographer must (3) _____ on a range of interpretations and weigh each against the others. Even so, the final portrait inevitably (4) _____ short of full objectivity, because selection itself implies judgement. The biographer must (5) _____ witness to the complexity of a human life without reducing it to a thesis. It would (6) _____ doubt on the entire enterprise to ignore contradictions or flatten inconvenient details. A good biography seeks instead to (7) _____ light on what drove a particular individual through their particular moment in history, and to (8) _____ a balance between the intimate and the universal.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Part 2 — Open Cloze

Questions 9–16

For questions 9–16, read the text below and think of the word which best fits each gap. Use only one word in each gap.

The economics of attention

It has long (9) argued that our most valuable resource is not money but time. Today, some economists insist the question of (10) digital attention is a resource that can be owned or sold remains unresolved. The challenge is compounded (11) the fact that online platforms have grown (12) rapidly that regulators struggle to keep pace. It is often unclear (13) constitutes genuine engagement and what amounts to passive scrolling. Some proposed interventions are so (14) as to require international coordination, ranging (15) binding legislation to voluntary industry codes. Critics argue that the attention economy has embedded itself in social behaviour in such a way (16) it cannot easily be reversed without significant disruption.

Part 3 — Word Formation

Questions 17–24

For questions 17–24, read the text below. Use the word given in capitals at the end of some of the lines to form a word that fits in the gap in the same line.

Sustainable architecture
Modern architects are expected to design (17) conscious buildings that minimise impact on the surrounding ecosystem.
ENVIRONMENT
The most (18) designs incorporate passive solar heating and green roofing systems that significantly reduce energy demands.
INNOVATE
Reducing energy (19) remains the central goal of any building certified to international sustainability standards.
CONSUME
Architects prize structural (20) , as buildings that can be adapted over time are far less likely to be demolished and rebuilt.
FLEXIBLE
Residents of early experimental green buildings sometimes found conditions (21) , particularly in winter when ventilation systems were insufficiently calibrated.
COMFORT
Clients are (22) willing to invest the higher upfront costs associated with sustainable materials, as long-term savings become better understood.
INCREASE
One risk identified by critics is excessive (23) on a single energy source, which can leave buildings vulnerable when supply is interrupted.
DEPEND
The (24) of urban spaces into zero-carbon districts requires the co-operation of local authorities, developers, and residents alike.
TRANSFORM
Part 4 — Key Word Transformation

Questions 25–30

For questions 25–30, complete the second sentence so that it has a similar meaning to the first sentence, using the word given. Do not change the word given. You must use between three and eight words, including the word given.

25

People think the tradition originated in the fifteenth century.

THOUGHT

The tradition in the fifteenth century.

26

The project was so challenging that many experts doubted it would succeed.

SUCH

It was that many experts doubted it would succeed.

27

If she hadn't intervened, the situation would have become critical.

HAD

, the situation would have become critical.

28

The results were published and the debate immediately intensified.

SOONER

been published than the debate immediately intensified.

29

Even though she was exhausted, she continued working.

SPITE

She continued working exhausted.

30

It would be worth reconsidering this approach.

WORTH

This approach .

Part 5 — Multiple Choice

Questions 31–36

For questions 31–36, read the text below and choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.

The architecture of memory

Alejandro Vega never set out to become a theorist. He trained as a civil engineer in the 1960s, working on infrastructure projects in cities that were expanding faster than their institutions could manage. It was only after a chance encounter with a historian studying urban displacement that Vega began to think about what buildings remember — and what they are made to forget. His first attempt at what he called "memorial architecture" was a modest community centre in a neighbourhood that had been partially demolished under a slum clearance programme. The building incorporated fragments of the demolished structures into its own fabric: a door frame here, a section of tiled floor there. Critics were largely indifferent at the time, but the community it served responded with an attachment that surprised even Vega himself.

The theoretical framework Vega developed over the following decade drew heavily on the work of French historians who argued that memory is embedded not only in documents but in physical space. He was less interested, however, in the idea of grand monuments than in what he called "the texture of ordinary life." His most celebrated building, the Civic Archive completed in 1979, appears at first glance to be a conventional administrative structure. Only on closer inspection does one notice the subtle incorporation of salvaged materials from the site's previous uses — a textile mill, a communal bathhouse — worked into the walls in ways that reward attentive looking. Vega insisted that such details should be discoverable rather than announced, holding that the most durable memorials are those that require effort to read.

His position was not without its critics. Some argued that an architecture legible only to those already in the know risked becoming merely self-congratulatory — an insider gesture that excluded the very communities it claimed to honour. Vega's response was characteristically forthright: he maintained that communities were more than capable of reading the spaces they inhabited, and that the assumption of illegibility said more about the critics than about the residents. He also pointed out that the meaning of a building shifts over time as the community that uses it changes, and that this openness to reinterpretation was a feature rather than a flaw.

Late in his career, Vega turned increasingly to writing, producing a series of essays that set out his convictions in direct and sometimes polemical prose. He was dismissive of what he called "the heritage industry" — the tendency to freeze the past in carefully managed tourist sites rather than allowing it to remain part of lived urban experience. For Vega, genuine memory required friction: it had to be encountered unexpectedly, in the middle of daily life, rather than sought out at a designated site. The museum, in his view, was the death of memory. Whether one agrees or not, the clarity of this position gave his writing an energy that purely architectural arguments rarely achieve.

Vega died in 2004, leaving behind a body of work that resists easy categorisation. He was neither a preservationist nor a straightforwardly modernist architect; his allegiances were to a particular way of thinking about time and community rather than to any stylistic programme. His legacy is most clearly visible not in the few large public buildings that bear his name but in the attitude he modelled — an insistence that buildings should carry their histories openly, and that the people who use them deserve to know where they stand.

31
What was the initial reaction to Vega's first "memorial architecture" project?
32
What does the writer suggest about Vega's Civic Archive?
33
How did Vega respond to critics who felt his architecture was too difficult to read?
34
What did Vega mean by saying that memory required "friction"?
35
The writer describes Vega's theoretical position as giving his writing "an energy that purely architectural arguments rarely achieve." What does this suggest?
36
According to the final paragraph, where is Vega's legacy most clearly seen?
Part 6 — Gapped Text

Questions 37–43

You are going to read an article about the science of sleep. Seven sentences have been removed. Choose from the sentences A–H the one which fits each gap. There is one extra sentence you do not need to use.

The science of sleep

Sleep is among the most universal of biological experiences, yet it remains one of the least understood. [37] Modern research has overturned this view decisively, revealing sleep to be a state of intense biological activity.

The discovery that sleep plays a central role in consolidating newly acquired memories was among the most significant advances in twentieth-century neuroscience. [38] Experiments have shown that subjects who sleep between learning and testing consistently outperform those who remain awake, an effect that has now been documented across a wide range of cognitive tasks.

Sleep is divided into distinct stages that cycle across the night, alternating between periods of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and non-REM sleep. [39] Deep non-REM sleep, for instance, appears particularly important for the consolidation of factual knowledge, while REM sleep is associated with emotional processing and procedural learning.

Among the more counterintuitive findings to emerge from recent research is that sleep deprivation impairs not only performance but also the ability to recognise that performance has been impaired. [40] Sleep-deprived individuals consistently rate their own alertness as higher than objective measures indicate, a bias that persists even after multiple nights of insufficient sleep.

The societal consequences of chronic sleep deprivation are substantial, encompassing increased rates of cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorder, and impaired immune function. [41] School start times, working hours, and the design of shift-work schedules are all areas where sleep science offers clear recommendations that have yet to be consistently adopted.

Part of the difficulty in translating sleep research into policy is that poor sleep is both a cause and a consequence of stress. [42] Disentangling the direction of causation in individual cases is therefore extremely difficult, which complicates efforts to design effective public health interventions.

What is clear is that sleep cannot be dismissed as a passive luxury. Its contributions to physical health, cognitive performance, and emotional resilience are each well established in the scientific literature. [43]

Removed sentences (one is extra):
A
This discovery upended decades of conventional thinking about the role of sleep in memory.
B
For most of human history, sleep was regarded as a passive state during which the body simply waited for waking life to resume.
C
It is this combination of cognitive and physical benefits that makes adequate sleep so difficult to replace with any other intervention.
D
The implications for public health policy are significant, even if the political will to act on them has been slow to materialise.
E
More recently, researchers have documented its role in emotional regulation, specifically in the processing of aversive experiences.
F
This is partly because the pressures of modern working life make chronic sleep deprivation a near-universal experience in industrialised societies.
G
These cycles, which typically repeat four to five times per night, are not random but are carefully sequenced to serve different biological purposes.
H
The history of sleep research is, in many ways, a history of scientists gradually realising how little they understood.
Part 7 — Multiple Matching

Questions 44–53

You are going to read about four scientists reflecting on communicating science to the public. For questions 44–53, choose from the sections (A–D). The sections may be chosen more than once.

A
Dr. Elena Sousa, geneticist
When I first started giving public talks about genetics, I presented the science exactly as I would to a graduate seminar. Audience feedback — some of it quite pointed — made it clear that this approach was not working. I began rethinking every talk from the audience's perspective: what did they actually need to know, and in what order? The tension between simplification and accuracy is one I have never fully resolved. Every time I make a concept more accessible, I worry I am sacrificing precision. And yet I believe strongly that scientists have a professional responsibility to communicate what they know; it is not optional. Staying entirely within the specialist literature, while personally comfortable, is a form of abdication. The public funds much of this research, and they are entitled to understand its implications.
B
Professor Kwame Asante, climate scientist
The response to my first attempt at public science writing genuinely took me aback. I had expected polite interest at best; what I received instead was a level of personal engagement from readers that I found both moving and, frankly, somewhat overwhelming. People wrote to describe how reading about climate systems had changed the way they thought about their own lives. That experience made me realise I needed a different kind of language — not simpler, exactly, but more human. I now make a point of beginning with examples drawn from my own fieldwork: a particular glacier I visited, a specific rainfall pattern I have watched change over twenty years. It took several years to develop this voice, and I am still refining it. Communicating science is a craft, and it requires the same sustained practice as any other.
C
Dr. Ingrid Larsson, neuroscientist
The field of neuroscience has a problem with popular representation that is, in my view, more severe than in almost any other discipline. Concepts such as neuroplasticity and left-brain versus right-brain thinking have entered common speech in forms that bear little relationship to what the research actually demonstrates. I find this deeply frustrating, not least because distorted neuroscience is regularly used to justify educational programmes and therapeutic interventions that have no evidence base. My response has been to engage directly with the institutions that perpetuate these myths: I have partnered with schools, teacher-training programmes, and several media organisations to provide what I hope is more accurate framing. The work is slow and sometimes discouraging, but I believe it is necessary.
D
Marcus Webb, science journalist turned researcher
I spent fifteen years writing about science before I became a scientist myself, which gives me a perspective on the communication problem that is perhaps unusual. My doctoral research drew on methods from both journalism and sociology, and I came to science already convinced of the value of the questions that non-experts ask. Specialists often dismiss these questions as naive, but I have found that the most productive challenges to established thinking frequently come from people who are not yet committed to the existing framework. I genuinely enjoy the process of being questioned by audiences who have no investment in the answer being a particular thing. That openness, which outsiders bring naturally and insiders often have to work to recover, strikes me as one of the most valuable resources in any research environment.
44
Which scientist was surprised by the public's reaction to their communication work?
45
Which scientist changed the way they present their subject in response to audience feedback?
46
Which scientist came to research from a different professional background?
47
Which scientist is concerned that their field is regularly misrepresented in public discussion?
48
Which scientist uses examples from their own fieldwork to illustrate their findings?
49
Which scientist acknowledges an unresolved tension between making science accessible and keeping it accurate?
50
Which scientist values the perspective that people outside a field bring to research questions?
51
Which scientist has worked with educational and media organisations to address misinformation?
52
Which scientist describes developing their own distinctive communication style over time?
53
Which scientist states that communicating research is a professional duty for scientists?

Check your work before submitting. You cannot change answers after submission.

CPE Mock Exam 2 — Results
Questions correct

Back to CPE Preparation